Logo
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Watch Your Mouth – Part II
By Harris Sherline

My wife and I have recently seen several movies in which we felt that the language was over-the-top.  The latest was The Ides of March, which opened with a barrage of four-letter words that would make most people blush when they are used in mixed company.  It was so bad that a few people left shortly after the beginning, which we speculated was probably because they were offended and unwilling to wait and see if it got any better.
 
Another recent movie in which the lead character barely had any lines that did not contain at least one offensive word was 50/50.
 
I’m not sure what motivates screen writers to write scripts that are dominated by such language, but assume it’s because they think it will make their films more appealing to movie goers, or at least the audience they are attempting to reach.
 
I submit that it doesn’t.  I have never heard anyone say that they wanted to see a movie because it had a lot of swearing in it.
 
Furthermore, call me old and out-of-touch, which I may be, but there are a lot of people in my generation (I’m 83) who agree with me, and we are a significant part of the movie-going public.
 
There was a time when openly swearing was not just frowned upon, it was illegal in some circumstances, such as on the air (radio or T.V.).  But, unfortunately, time and the changing mores of American society have not only made inappropriate language commonplace but almost universally accepted.
 
Years ago, it was not unusual for parents to wash their children’s mouth out with soap for using “bad language.”  Today, it seems as though many parents have been corrupted by the change in mores to that point that they not only tolerate their children’s use of offensive language but frequently use it themselves.  We are routinely assaulted by over-the-top verbal assaults in the movies, on T.V., in the schools and workplace, even in public speeches on occasion.
 
For example, in March 2010, the Vice President of the United States dropped the “f-bomb” when the President signed the health care reform bill.  Joe Biden’s comment was intended for Obama’s ears only, when Biden whispered, “This is a big f-ing deal,” as they shook hands in front of a cheering crowd.
 
Researchers point out that swearing has been around for centuries, noting that the taboo status of certain words is what makes them powerful, because they enable people to express strong feelings.
 
Studies have found that swearing can provide both “emotional release and relief from pain.”  People often feel better after saying something that might otherwise be considered taboo.  The specific words that are considered unacceptable change over time, but every generation has such expressions.
 
The power of swear words comes from their status as generally being inappropriate in “polite society.”  The more restrictions there are on specific words, the more alluring it is to use them.  Geoff Nunberg, a linguist at the University of California, Berkeley, notes, “It’s emphatic and has an intensity of emotion.”
 
Psychologist Timothy Jay, of the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts in North Adams, believes that words like the “f-bomb” have “an intensity of emotion that conveys the intensity of emotion that best expresses strong feelings.”
 
Curse words have been around for hundreds of years, maybe more, although the specific words that are considered vulgar change over time.
 
Throughout history, swear words have reflected the taboos of time and place. A century or two ago, religious words dominated the lewd lexicon: Hell and damn were unspeakable in proper company.
 
Lexicographer Jesse Sheidlower, editor at large of the Oxford English Dictionary wrote a book called “The F-Word,” noted that the “f-bomb” has 15th-century Germanic origins, and that the word's root meant "to move back and forth."
 
Over the centuries, the f-word has appeared repeatedly in obscene contexts in letters and poems, sometimes written in code. At some point in the 20th century, Sheidlower said it began to be used beyond its sexual connotations. As the word became more figurative, it also became increasingly versatile.
 
Today, variations of the word can function as a noun, a verb, an adjective, an adverb and an expletive. It can be used to describe almost anything. Not only can the word be anything you want it to be, it has also become an equal-opportunity expression.  That is, women use it just as much as men do..
 
"I think this is one of the most important words in the language," Sheidlower said. "People use it all the time."

Swearing in the workplace has also become more commonplace, although there are limits, such as being openly using swear words in meetings or when they are directed as specific individuals, such as calling a woman a “bitch” or a “whore.”
 
In one dispute, the defendant argued that he had a right to freedom of speech based on section 16 of the Constitution and should therefore not be disciplined for his statements. However, the arbitrator found that this right also carried a duty, which related to respecting the fundamental worth and dignity of fellow human beings. The argument was therefore rejected and the finding of dismissal confirmed.
 
One important labor law case concluded that there are a variety of employment environments where vulgar language is accepted as a standard means of communication. The finding noted that vulgar language in the workplace occurs in two situations: when an employee or manager swears as a sign of frustration and not at a person, and where swearing is directed at a fellow-employee. Although swearing may be the cause for a reprimand of the employee, swearing that is directed at a fellow-employee could result in serious grievance and/or disciplinary action, perhaps even harassment claims against the employer.
 
© 2011 Harris R. Sherline, All Rights Reserved
Posted at 14:31 PM By admin | Permalink | Email this Post | Comments (0)


Comments View Comments   
No Comments Found.

Login Login
Email Address* :
Password* :

New Registration Forgot Password?
Categories Categories
Al Fonzi
Andy Caldwell
Ashly Donavan
Bill Glynn
Dan Logue
Darin Selnick
Dr. George Watson
Dr. Jane Orient, M.D.
Dr. Mike Tabor
Dr. Wendy James
Gary Beckner
Gordon Mullin
Gretchen Hamel
Harris Sherline
Janet Cronick
Jerry Scheidbach
Joe Armendariz
Judson Phillips
Lowell Ponte
Matt Barber
Matt Kokkonen
Mike Brown
Mike Gorbell
Mike Stoker
Phil Kiver
Richard Cochrane
Richard Fryer
Richard S. Quandt
Robert Jeffers
Robyn Hayhurst
Roger Hedgecock
Rooster Bradford
Santa Barbara City Watch
Stephen Wallace, M.S. Ed.
RSS Feed RSS Feed
Top 10 Recent BlogRSS Feed
Al FonziRSS Feed
Andy CaldwellRSS Feed
Ashly DonavanRSS Feed
Bill GlynnRSS Feed
Dan LogueRSS Feed
Darin SelnickRSS Feed
Dr. George WatsonRSS Feed
Dr. Jane Orient, M.D.RSS Feed
Dr. Mike TaborRSS Feed
Dr. Wendy JamesRSS Feed
Gary BecknerRSS Feed
Gordon MullinRSS Feed
Gretchen HamelRSS Feed
Harris SherlineRSS Feed
Janet CronickRSS Feed
Jerry Scheidbach RSS Feed
Joe ArmendarizRSS Feed
Judson PhillipsRSS Feed
Lowell PonteRSS Feed
Matt BarberRSS Feed
Matt KokkonenRSS Feed
Mike BrownRSS Feed
Mike GorbellRSS Feed
Mike StokerRSS Feed
Phil KiverRSS Feed
Richard CochraneRSS Feed
Richard FryerRSS Feed
Richard S. QuandtRSS Feed
Robert JeffersRSS Feed
Robyn HayhurstRSS Feed
Roger HedgecockRSS Feed
Rooster BradfordRSS Feed
Santa Barbara City WatchRSS Feed
Stephen Wallace, M.S. Ed.RSS Feed
Archives Archives
Skip Navigation Links.
Tag Cloud Tag Cloud                      
Validator Validator
XHTML | CSS